Results 521 to 530 of 1184
-
June 29th, 2020 03:16 PM #521
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 2,618
June 29th, 2020 05:57 PM #522
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 3,503
June 30th, 2020 01:26 AM #523What was the basis for such claims? Any comparison test made, single pass/multi-pass efficiency? Please provide link.
USDM truckers are dominated by Baldwin, Cummins Fleetguard, Cat, Donaldson, Parker might as well compare them. Wix, Fram, Purolator, etc were originally intended for small cars.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Posts
- 35
June 30th, 2020 11:18 AM #524
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 2,618
June 30th, 2020 11:41 AM #525
-
June 30th, 2020 12:33 PM #526
Finally someone who agrees with me re: K&N air filters. I've been saying that for years. The way they achieve more flow is to have a lot less efficient filtration. They try to argue it's only within a percent or so, but over a few thousand kms run that's gonna be a lot of contaminants sandpapering your engine.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 527
June 30th, 2020 12:55 PM #527Actually JS Asakashi is a Japanese brand which in order to compete with the other brands sends their materials from Japan to South Korea to assemble the whole filters to make the costs lower yet maintaining their material quality. Sakura and JS Asakashi are completely different with one another they have no business with each other. Some of the WIX USA filters are also painted in white color, also the previous Purolator for the Asian market was also white in color. Sakura wasn't the 1st one to use white paint on spin-on filters.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 527
June 30th, 2020 12:57 PM #528Yes yet people in order to save a few bucks then to buy the washable filters which are actually not good at filtering contaminants.
You can watch the actual video of the contaminants passing through the K&N filters compared with the other brands, also K&N was shown to have the worst filtration even when compared to a China generic filter.
Search in youtube:
"Which Car Air Filter is Best? Let's find out! Fram, K&N, Wix, Purolator, & AC Delco showdown" - Title
"www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJ3L-E-ufYo&fbclid=IwAR1M2SlR-D8Qo-QAcY5cHmkNThJ79y-9vv9bT0aC3F14Y_kW_zQGYwBiJIc"
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 527
June 30th, 2020 01:01 PM #529This is the link for the source which I saw the reviews on Baldwin.
1 Best Oil Filters (June. 2 2 ) - Buyer's Guide and Reviews
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 527
June 30th, 2020 01:52 PM #530Sorry but I think you misunderstood and are comparing apples with oranges.
VIC was tested 87% filtration for 40 Microns of contaminants(Size of dirt particles) for 5 minutes and after 10 minutes VIC filtration dropped by 6% from 87% to 81% for the 40 microns size of contaminants.
Baldwin was tested 85.44% filtration for 12~30 Microns of contaminants(Size of dirt particles)
VIC's testing was using 40 microns which is 10-28 microns or 43~75% bigger than Baldwin's average 10~30 microns. VIC was only tested for 10 minutes which is very alarming since it dropped 6% immediately based from the tests.
What you need to compare is VIC's 10, 20 & 30 Micron filtration rating with Baldwin in order to get the most accurate comparison:
VIC testing 30 microns: 71% and 10 microns: 4% at 5 minutes
VIC testing 30 microns: 68% and 10 microns: 4% at 10 minutes
Baldwin testing 12~30 microns: 85.44% unknown duration of test
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines