Results 2,081 to 2,090 of 8159
-
-
-
-
April 19th, 2014 12:21 AM #2084
Well, you guys are in the minority. Most of the expensive and powerful phone users I know don't really need that much power, why do they buy it? I know you know the answer to that.
Most of the powerful Android smartphone buyers are actually getting the Andriods and not the iPhones or the Windows Phones, solely on specs. Saying things like "The Samsung S4 has 2gb of RAM, why buy the iPhone and its 1gb?!"
Also, ang hirap maging productive kapag smartphone ang gamit, andaming masasayang na oras. Sometimes, people are opting to use their smartphones for work just because it can, and not actually because it's the best efficient option at the moment.
-
April 19th, 2014 01:06 AM #2085
^i feel you bro, dami ganyan buying just to catch up sa trend. Dami sa office ganyan bought an expensive phone para lang FB and IG 24/7. Hindi ma-fully utilize yun capabilities ng smartphone.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
April 19th, 2014 09:47 AM #2086
Well, it's still their money, errr... credit card. lol
------------------
I am the highway...
-
April 19th, 2014 12:13 PM #2087
What's the best value quality smartphone these days? Exclude the local and China brand units due to quality issues.
Last edited by Walter; April 19th, 2014 at 12:31 PM.
-
April 19th, 2014 12:30 PM #2088
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 11
April 19th, 2014 02:32 PM #2089happy and satisfied user of Cherry Mobile Flare 2.1 Android 4.1 JB.
1 of the cheapest Android phone in the market.... specs nya pang mamahalin na Samsung galaxy na.
Posted via Tsikot Mobile App
-
April 19th, 2014 03:07 PM #2090
Speaking of smartphone wars: Samsung vs. Apple again
SAN JOSE, Calif. -- An Apple study to determine whether people would buy phones to get certain Apple patented features is similar to asking people to choose a car based on its cup holders, an expert hired by Samsung testified Friday.
David Reibstein, chaired professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business, on Friday refuted Apple expert John Hauser's testimony from earlier this month. Hauser, the Kirin professor of marketing at the MIT Sloan School of Management, conducted a conjoint study that determined Apple's patented features made Samsung's devices more appealing.
However, Reibstein said Hauser's study was flawed because it didn't take into account major factors such as phone brand, it generated data that couldn't be relied upon, and it led to invalid results.
"There were several [factors that drove consumers' phone purchasing decisions]," Reibstein said. "None of them included the ... patented features that are the focal point in this case."Damn, son! Where'd you find this?
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines