Results 521 to 530 of 1183
-
May 27th, 2015 07:38 AM #521
^ my thoughts exactly but as per seminar, renew lang before expiry otherwise start from scratch. BTW check out posters ng coming gun show nabawasan requirements sana di na baguhin/dagdagan
-
May 27th, 2015 08:57 AM #522
Used to own a Gen 2 Glock 17. Great pistol. Goes bang all the time when you pull the trigger. Minimal maintenance and cleaning, which is why it's hugely popular with civilians and law enforcement. Doesn't rust or lose its finish if you keep it as a closet queen.
For those using the M1911 platform, how often do you have to clean it? Do you do anything to maintain the finish?
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Posts
- 4,580
May 27th, 2015 09:56 AM #523please don't do that! ☺ kasi yung baril kahit declared loose FA na nasa data base pa rin ng PNP. atsaka kung iplant mo yan after killing the criminal, makuha yan sa ballistic na sayo yan. so ma complicated pa yung kaso. kung mag plant ka huwag sa inyo. puede naman toy gun yung parang totoo. in highly stressful situation you don't have time to check if the gun of the bad guy isn't a real gun. you need quick reaction to save your own life. more importantly, self-defense is a justifying circumstance. in the eyes of the law, you're not committing a crime. under section 29 of RA 10591, the use of a loose firearm is only an aggravating circumstance when inherent in the commission of a crime punished by the revised penal code. so kung justified ka, walang kaso na ma - aggravate.
(basta huwag mag plant ng evidence mali yan ☺ )
-
-
May 27th, 2015 11:21 PM #525
Somebody once told me not to use self defense as a defense because the burden of proof shifts to you, the best defense according to him is still denial. What is your thought about this Atty. JM or any other lawyer here?
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Posts
- 4,580
May 27th, 2015 11:44 PM #526
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Posts
- 4,580
May 27th, 2015 11:55 PM #527the burden of proof remains with the prosecution because of the presumption of innocence under the constitution. what shifts to the accused is the burden of evidence. having admitted the killing, the burden is on his shoulders to establish with evidence the elements of self-defense
(First. Unlawful aggression.
Second. Reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel it.
Third. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself)
apart from being self-serving, defense of denial is the weakest defense because it can easily be concocted.
in legitimate self-defense, the truth is on your side, then why do you deny it?
-
May 28th, 2015 12:32 AM #528
So the qualification should be fulfillment of those elements for self defense to be legitimate otherwise if one of those elements is absent then I guess denial kicks in.[emoji2].
The case of Sony Parsons suddenly flashed to me, claimed self defense but was still charged with homicide.
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Posts
- 4,580
May 28th, 2015 12:48 AM #529^ a) puede na. but that is incomplete self-defense. it is a mitigating circumstance.
b) because self-defense is a matter of defense you'll still be charged in court. you are burdened to prove its elements. but there are prosecutors who, at the preliminary investigation stage, would dismiss the complaint if the evidence of self-defense is very obvious.
-
May 28th, 2015 08:22 AM #530
Basta pag self defense siguruhin mong patay yung umatake sa iyo. Double tap even if you have a 45. Dead men tell no tales.