Counterflowing Jaguar driver enrages netizens

[shadow]

Tumatayo lang dito si Atty. na parang defense lawyer nung jaguar driver.

Ganun talaga kapag abogado ka, lahat ng argumento sisilipin mo, kahit yung obvious na. Kasi kahit wala ka sa korte kapag naubusan ka ng argumento, ikaw ang talo.

And sa korte kahit masyado ng obvious, kapag nakumbinsi mo ang judge, either na mabilog mo ang ulo nya sa argument mo or sirain mo credibility ng kalaban mo, wala na yung obvious na ebidensya mo.

Kaya mga paps, wag kayo maaasar kay atty., pinapakita nya lang kung ano ang pwedeng mga counter arguments nung jaguar driver. Alam naman natin lahat na guilty sya at nag counter flow dahil nga "obvious".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Tumatayo lang dito si Atty. na parang defense lawyer nung jaguar driver.

Ganun talaga kapag abogado ka, lahat ng argumento sisilipin mo, kahit yung obvious na. Kasi kahit wala ka sa korte kapag naubusan ka ng argumento, ikaw ang talo.

And sa korte kahit masyado ng obvious, kapag nakumbinsi mo ang judge, either na mabilog mo ang ulo nya sa argument mo or sirain mo credibility ng kalaban mo, wala na yung obvious na ebidensya mo.

Kaya mga paps, wag kayo maaasar kay atty., pinapakita nya lang kung ano ang pwedeng mga counter arguments nung jaguar driver. Alam naman natin lahat na guilty sya at nag counter flow dahil nga "obvious".

Wala naman tayo sa court of law ah. Korte ba itong tsikot? [emoji1]

[mfabajon]

Dirty debate tactics are commonly used by dishonest politicians and lawyers of guilty parties. One is when the person say my credentials are better than yours (wth?). Another is being deliberately vague using words and facts that only a few can understand (talk s***). And every troll's favorite tactic...badgering or endless repetition in an attempt to tire everyone out (paulit-ulit). Matatalino na kabataan ngayon. Di na madaling mauto.

[cast_no_shadow]

And every troll's favorite tactic...badgering or endless repeatition in an attempt to tire everyone out (paulit-ulit).

Asan na nga ulit si Philsat? MIA pa din?Hehe



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[e2romo]

if you look closely, may last clear chance pa yung law enforcer para hindi masapak.

Tama, may baril nang nabunot yung driver. Dapat yung enforcers na umiwas dahil wala pa silang baril. Kasalanan ng TE kasi sila yung may chance umiwas pero hindi umiwas. Yung SUV driver hindi na makakaiwas dahil buo na loob sawayin ang batas, tulad ng Jaguar driver.

[mfabajon]

Asan na nga ulit si Philsat? MIA pa din?Hehe




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha. MIA lang nagets ko.

[Juan Martinez]

having doubts now...
I know several lawyers and a judge.. if we're having arguments they don't mention any case or whatsoever. low profile lang lahat...

there are also a lot of senior citizen lawyers here in tsikot pero they do not say "I'm a lawyer and base on this case blah blah...

anyway daming irony sa mga statements... wag nalang patulan..

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

having doubts now...
I know several lawyers and a judge.. if we're having arguments they don't mention any case or whatsoever. low profile lang lahat...

there are also a lot of senior citizen lawyers here in tsikot pero they do not say "I'm a lawyer and base on this case blah blah...

anyway daming irony sa mga statements... wag nalang patulan..

japeeps, invite your lawyers and judges friends so that we can talk. it is really difficult to talk to a layman like you about jurisprudence and legal principles. what comes to mind was the impeachment trial of president estrada when joker arroyo had a verbal tussle on some finer points of the law with former senator Francisco Tatad. Joker cut off Tatad (who is not a lawyer, but a brilliant fellow. he was one the spokesman of the late president marcos) by saying, "I'd rather argue with a lawyer." now, japeeps I ask you, you invite your judges and lawyer friends here so that we can talk about the law. I don't want to argue with you about it. ok?

[Juan Martinez]

Sir Juan, I perfectly understand "due process" but we are not in a court of law. This is a forum. We don't need "due process" here.

What I can't understand is you kept on saying due process about him counter flowing. Hinde pa ba obvious na nag counter flow siya based Sa video nakita mo?

Kung hinde counter flow yun bakit siya nag merge Doon Sa correct lane?

And alisin mo pagka lawyer mo dito Dahil wala naman connection Sa issue hinde Naman kami naghahanap ng rule of law.

We don't need to complicate issue dito Sa forum.

Jaguar driver counterflowed he admitted his mistakes. But you're saying otherwise, kahit na obvious na Sa video

shadow, maraming salamat na alam nyo pala yung "due process of law." if we read all the posts here from the beginning, the issue was relegated to this erroneous postulate na: he drove a fancy car=he was rich=he could easily violate our laws. shadow, he admitted he ran fast. did he admit he counterflowed? that video is admissible in the court of law against him (but kailangan pang establish yung authenticity nyan. evidence is a difficult subjevt). but still the prosecution has the burden of proving by proof beyond reasonable doubt that he committed the crime charged. di sa pagmamayabang, nagturo po tayo ng criminal law, constitutional law, criminal procedure, evidence close to 20 years. way of life na natin yan. you cannot just hammer into my throat your opinion kasi iba yung background ko sa inyo. that is why I keep saying let us agree to disagree kasi a person however guilty in the mind of every body may piring yung katarungan natin. yan ang tinuturo natin sa mga estudyante na ngayon naging abogado na. so let us agree to disagree muna. ok?

[Juan Martinez]

Ay hindi pala marunomg magbasa ng english ire. Di kita tinawag na sh!t. Sinabi ko your profession as law professor don't mean sh!t here. Sa tagalog, bale wala pagka law professor mo dito. Gets?

Playing god, oo ikaw yun. Kung maka lecture ka kala mo ikaw lang may utak. Fits you to a tee, professor!

yebo, I'm not playing god. if you say "hindi pala marunong magbasa na english". it is not true. anyway, why do you use the word "sh!t" here? where does it come from? yebo, I'm not just a MERE professor. open your mind. you learn many things here. ok?

[cast_no_shadow]

Sabe senyo eh hindi talaga nag counterflow.

Case closed!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Juan Martinez]

We as a people have become more emotional, temperamental and vindictive. Gone are the days of free exchange of opinion where a difference of belief or understanding would not even spark an argument nor a revolution. People are weary and tired and it shows in their words and demeanor. A simple traffic misunderstanding that leads to altercation and worst, sometimes death. People are arguing as if they are fighting for something but they wouldn't really champion for anything or anyone. They want someone to rally and fight for them but would never really lift a finger to contribute to a cause. They easily get frustrated that the internet court becomes their Plaza Miranda for swift justice. This jaguar incident should help us all see what good can come out of this incident so we can have a unified solution to social problems like these egotistical morons who drive for their bosses but behave like untouchables. I wish that forum threads like these would help bind people together not break them apart by guiltless freedom of expression. Let us try to be the real Filipinos of yesteryears who were known to be calm, respectful and helpful in imparting knowledge or sharing and not overly expressing their thoughts as if one's thinking is better than the other. Just watching from the sidelines… keep safe everyone.

thank you for your nuggets of wisdom. really true.