New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community
New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 25 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 249
  1. Walter's Avatar
    Walter is offline Tsikot Member Rank 2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    10,213
    July 5th, 2004 11:16 PM #11
    Driving habit is still a factor.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. kiper's Avatar
    kiper is offline PowerTORQ CrewMember
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    4,085
    July 6th, 2004 05:45 AM #12
    Originally posted by pajerokid
    Care to expound on this? From personal experience, what you get is what you get.

    If we're talking about parts setting in, there's always a chance that fuel economy would worsen as much as it'll improve Either way, the difference is hardlu felt.
    It's indicated in the Ford Escape manual. Before having the 1st PMS, I got an average of 4-5 kms per Liter only. Now I have atleast 5-6.5 kms per liter on city driving.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. pajerokid's Avatar
    pajerokid is offline Bad Photographer
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    10,603
    July 6th, 2004 10:15 AM #13
    wow! laki ng difference ah!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. ILuvDetailing's Avatar
    ILuvDetailing is offline Tsikoteer
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    11,913
    July 6th, 2004 10:53 AM #14
    wombat, break-in pa lang ng rav4 sv ko. pero umaabot ako ng 9-10km/L city. 13km/L hiway
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Wow mas matipid pala yung RAV4, ok talaga yung vvti technology
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. wombat is offline Verified Tsikot Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    82
    July 6th, 2004 06:56 PM #15
    oh well, thanks mga peeps sa inputs. I guess I'll just have to wait few more thousand kms. to see if my mileage improves.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. Monseratto's Avatar
    Monseratto is offline Social Dementia
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    25,148
    July 6th, 2004 08:44 PM #16
    isn't the 2.0l escape engine known to be gas-guzzling, underpowered and rather antiquated? Mazdas aren't known for being fuel efficient compared to Honda VTEC or Toyota VVTI. Also the horror stories about the MT transmission Escape make you think twice about owning one.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. kiper's Avatar
    kiper is offline PowerTORQ CrewMember
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    4,085
    July 7th, 2004 02:17 AM #17
    The RAV SV uses a manual transmission, got a smaller engine, smaller over-all size and lighter weight. My escape is all of the opposite..kaya mas matipid talaga ang RAV.

    I've also installed K&N finer filters.

    Escapes equipped with manual transmission has a clutch problem..too bad.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. ingwid is offline Verified Tsikot Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    22
    July 9th, 2004 12:46 PM #18
    My 4x4 RAV averages 9kms/litre. Break-in period pa.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. mazdamazda's Avatar
    mazdamazda is offline www.bigbigcar.com
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    14,822
    July 9th, 2004 01:59 PM #19
    baka naman mas better matched ang 2.3L engine sa escape rather than the 2.0L?

    baka naman hirap yung 2.0L kaya ganun...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. kiper's Avatar
    kiper is offline PowerTORQ CrewMember
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    4,085
    July 9th, 2004 02:25 PM #20
    mejo.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 25 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Tsikot

Ford Fuel Consumption Database