Help me choose - 2009 Civic 1.8V or 2009 Jazz 1.5V

[mda]

If the A/T is not a prerequisite, the Civic 1.8S M/T is the perfect compromise

Ito nga sana, "S" variant for 10k more.

[niky]

I guess I'm different... I like the Jazz more. The Civic may have more elbow room, but the GE Jazz is more comfortable (seats are still hard, but not as bad as the Civic... suspension more pliant) and has very good cargo handling.

As long as you don't carry five people often... and even if you carry four everyday... the Jazz is a better car. More practical, more economical... more toys for your money.

[oflutrev]

Thanks for the replies. Keep them coming.

[mda]

Hindi ba pwedeng 1.8S A/T nalang?

[oflutrev]

Hindi ba pwedeng 1.8S A/T nalang?

My budget can't afford it.

[green_machine]

I actually think the Jazz is the better option, if you're okay with the price (which is quite overpriced for its class IMO). It has enough power for everyday use, while also having more features than the relatively bare 1.8V. Its functionality is also a big plus.

[aejhayl17]

for me , if for everyday used, jazz na ko, makakatipid pa ako sa panggas, i may use that extra money for additional modifications pa,. imagine the difference ng FC ng 1.8 at 1.5 engines. Jazz for practicality on daily usage.

if any special threatment, civic 1.8 na. di hamak na mas maporma sa Jazz, performance wise and safety incentives are better(mas malake kase). uglier FC than Jazz due to engine size difference. Civic for gwapo

imho

[ryan]

My take on this comparo is that if the Jazz 1.5 A/T suits all your car needs, I'd say go for it.

Sure, you are getting more "metal" with the Civic but you will also be getting the base model which lacks some safety features.

At the end of the day, the 76k you saved can be used elsewhere and you will probably get good resale value with the Jazz anyway.