Results 481 to 490 of 828
-
June 18th, 2010 10:08 PM #481
Here's the sticking point we got stuck on before.
The data only shows that many people are registering imported vehicles or commercial vehicles that have been converted (taxis). They do not show that these people chose them over locally-assembled brand-new units.
Kaya nga, the question is: If that person didn't buy a secondhand Subic Pajero or Delica... would they have bought a brand new Jeepney or a brand new Pajero? Or would they just buy a local secondhand. (and remember... local secondhands maintain their prices, even if Subic or Cagayan units are available, so the idea that those units affect the resale value of local units is a wash).
Buyers who buy a surplus Pajero aren't the same buyers who'd buy a brand-new L300 FB. Delica buyers maybe, but buyers who want an FB for commercial use would more likely buy a used local FB, since these are available for much less than imported Delicas.
No formal study has been done to show what these buyers' considerations were. Some surveys have shown that these buyers wouldn't buy new, anyway. I'd actually be interested to find out, really, if the government were to sponsor a survey, what's really happening.
Strangely, the L300 FB is already one of the best-selling cars on the market... why would it need government incentives?
In other words the PBV will make brand new utility vehicles affordable to the public and will eventually replace (gradually) old vehicles.
Also, the program of the government of replacing old engines of jeepneys is still existing. Old diesel engines will be replaced with LPG powered engines.
David motors is also promoting the conversion of old jeepney engines with brand new LPG powered engines which are cheaper than diesel engines.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
June 18th, 2010 10:08 PM #482
ang focus ng mvdp is to stop the importation of used vehicles. vehicles ha. yung completely assembled. exempted dyan yung mga special vehicles na binanggit ni niky at yung mga personal vehicles ng mga diplomats. pag-naayos na yung batas na yan, at lahat agree, special vehicles na lang ang mabebenta mo uls. pero dahil pwede pa rin yung used engine at used parts, i-chop-chop mo na yung mga merchandise mo. dapat i-define nila yung ibig sabihin ng complete vehicle. dahil pag pinasok mo ng walang gulong, technically, di na complete vehicle yun. siguro dapat ...walang engine, walang gulong, walang pinto, etc..etc,. para makapagbenta ka pa rin. at para meron pa ring parts para sa mga lumang sasakyan.
-
June 18th, 2010 10:10 PM #483
Of course their are proofs that you are just concocting conclusions based on your faulty understanding of my stand. Definitely like uls,
Im denouncing all imported smuggled vehicles and parts. You forgot the smuggled term. Unless you are trying to deliberately omitting it to prove your point.
Have you read my explanations regarding the articles and my corresponding comments? They were meant to express my opinion. And Im not forcing anyone and myself to argue about it.
Im letting people to read it and react about it.
Im imposing theoretical ideas? Obviously you cant distinguish what is theoretical and not theoretical in my posts.
besides Im not the one imposing ideas in Tsikot. You are.
You are not even moderating. In fact you are harassing posters like me.
You said a person is evil or devil? Are you making a spin again or inventing
stories again ghosthunter?
I simply declare them as smugglers?Did I do that? You are really good in inventing stories ghosthunter. Read my posts carefully.Last edited by jpdm; June 18th, 2010 at 10:21 PM.
-
June 18th, 2010 10:18 PM #484
But these do not change the fact that smuggled second hands are negatively affecting the local auto industry. As I have pointed out many times in this thread using various articles with resource persons coming from the auto sector itself.
Its very clear.
Strangely, the L300 FB is already one of the best-selling cars on the market... why would it need government incentives?
Price is the problem. And convincing people to buy brand new instead of secondhand, in the first place. There's a market for brand new, but volume is a limiting factor.
While I'm pro-LPG, I'm a bit wary of this program, not knowing the source of these engines and their possible long-term durability. Though getting a lot of those polluting old diesels off the road is a good thing.
David Motors, a jeepney maker also is in the conversion of diesel to LPG because its cheaper and cleaner.
-
June 18th, 2010 10:21 PM #485
No arguments re: utility and LPG.
And their only source of data is new vehicle registrations. Ever wonder why they don't present a study on buyer profiles or a breakdown of what cars make up that mix? How many of those registrations of "new" vehicles that are used as commercial vehicles and which are not covered by government exemption? That would be telling.
Take note:
I do not support a ban on the importation of secondhand vehicles. Instead, I would push for the proper implementation of taxes on secondhands and stringent roadworthiness tests. This would kill any claim that imports are killing the market.
How?
Take a SUV-ic Pajero. How much does it cost? Pennies.
And yet, if you apply the proper taxes, (100% luxury tax based on brand new price, considering it's an import), force converters to use brand new LHD conversion parts and force it to undergo roadworthiness testing (ala UK or Japan), it'll cost 1.5 million pesos. Who'd buy it then over a local unit costing half that?
And yet the government allowed these cars in, with loopholes because they were declared salvage, or under-declared. Customs didn't go by their book value, so they snuck in.
And the LTO and LTFRB don't do their job in keeping dangerous old trucks ,buses and jeeps off our street. If they simply impounded all the non-roadworthy vehicles, our public fleets would gradually become more modern. Simply impound all RHD-LHD conversions that use RHD racks welded in on the wrong side of the car and you'll take thousands of imports off the street.
Just look at the taxi fleets and how they improved after they cracked down on the "rolling coffins".
It merely takes proper enforcement to improve the situation, not more laws. My beef with the whole thing is they're wasting so much time and energy on legislation, when it's spending more money on proper implementation that's the problem.
(Of course, lawmakers, being as they are, would rather make more laws than fix the problems that exist... like the move to 12 years of basic education being pushed by P.Noy... we don't even have enough teachers for our current 10 year system... and, as us teachers know... the problem isn't the number of years, but the lack of investment in manpower and teaching materials that is holding us back...)Last edited by niky; June 18th, 2010 at 10:34 PM.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
June 18th, 2010 10:30 PM #486
Hahaha..obviously walang masabing matino. Saan nga ba mundo mo? Di mo nga alam kung ang smuggled vehicle nare-rehistro....
By the way natanong mo na ba ang LTFRB tungkol sa plano nilang higpitan ang requirements sa mga PUJ? Ay oo nga pala katulad ka ng mga idol mo dito galing mag-project.wala naman.
You get real too.:gayfight:Last edited by jpdm; June 18th, 2010 at 10:35 PM.
-
June 18th, 2010 10:47 PM #487
O nagproject ka naman.
Hirap talagang makipag debate rito sa makulit na ito. Hina naman umintindi.
Mas slow ka kasi hindi mo inintindi mabuti nakasulat sa article. Sana lang galing galingan mo conclusion mo. E hindi mali mali interpretasyon mo.
Basahin mo nga uli yung article para naman tumama ng konti mga sinasabi mo.
Sinabi lang ba ng article na Beep lang ipapalit? nabasa mo ba na mapipilitang bumili rin ng bagong PUJ mga operator?O isaayos luma nilang sasakyan?Para sumunod sa standards ng LTFRB?
In the first place, kahit naman suporta ko native jeepneys kailangan naman upgrade nila ang units nila. By coming up with new standards ( LTFRB) jeepney operators will be force to upgrade or maintain their vehicles.
Not necessary replace them by BEEP.
Naintindihan mo. Slow ka talaga.
Basahin mo uli ang article ha. Nang-iinsulto kapa e mas slow ka.
-
June 18th, 2010 11:15 PM #488
Oyil:
ahhhhh...ang pagkakaintindi ni uls dito ay immediate palit lahat ng mga jeepney in favor of the mitsu beep and the isuzu passenger truck . ganun ba ang ibig sabihin ni jpdm?
mukang di mo nabasa mabuti
saan mo nakuha yung Isuzu passenger truck?
the article says the Beep has a Mitsubishi Canter platform with a bus body built by Almazora
-
June 18th, 2010 11:27 PM #489
sabi ni jpdm:
Sinabi lang ba ng article na Beep lang ipapalit? nabasa mo ba na mapipilitang bumili rin ng bagong PUJ mga operator?O isaayos luma nilang sasakyan?Para sumunod sa standards ng LTFRB?
Alberto Suansing, chairman of the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board, made the statement at the launching of the Beep, a combination bus and jeep, as an alternative to the jeepney, a modified version of the Jeep used by the US military during World War II.Suansing said jeepney owners failing to comply with the new rules should start thinking of buying brand-new replacements—including the Beep.
clear govt endorse of the Beep
--
the new regulations are deliberately set too strict for PUJs to meet
they know a large number of PUJs can't meet the new standards
they are expecting 50% of PUJs to fail
“The [Land Transportation Office] has come up with new regulations on the inspection of motor vehicles, and we expect many public utility vehicles will not meet the requirements,” Suansing said.
“I would say almost 50 percent of the jeepney population will be affected.”
The LTO will require public utility vehicles—jeepneys in particular—to have speedometers, hand brakes, headlights and wipers, among other things, according to Joel Donato, head of the agency’s Motor Vehicle Inspection Service.
“We are implementing these requirements with the start of registration in January 2010,” he said.
to open up a huge market for new-car-makers
the govt endorsement of the Beep is obvious regulatory capture by the new-car lobby
somebody is too slow to pick up on what's happening behind the scenesLast edited by uls; June 18th, 2010 at 11:45 PM.
-
June 18th, 2010 11:43 PM #490
for the slow:
wiki:
Regulatory capture occurs when a state regulatory agency created to act in the public interest instead acts in favor of the commercial or special interests that dominate in the industry or sector it is charged with regulating. Regulatory capture is a form of government failure, as it can act as an encouragement for large firms to produce negative externalities. The agencies are called Captured Agencies.