Results 21 to 30 of 103
-
August 30th, 2005 11:39 AM #21
Originally Posted by oldblue
"SECTION 19. Eminent Domain. − A local government unit may, through its chief executive and acting pursuant to an ordinance, exercise the power of eminent domain for public use, or purpose, or welfare for the benefit of the poor and the landless, upon payment of just compensation, pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution and pertinent laws: Provided, however, That the power of eminent domain may not be exercised unless a valid and definite offer has been previously made to the owner, and such offer was not accepted: Provided, further, That the local government unit may immediately take possession of the property upon the filing of the expropriation proceedings and upon making a deposit with the proper court of at least fifteen percent (15%) of the fair market value of the property based on the current tax declaration of the property to be expropriated: Provided, finally, That, the amount to be paid for the expropriated property shall be determined by the proper court, based on the fair market value at the time of the taking of the property."
thus, taking can be done for the following reasons: a) for public use; b) public purpose; c) public welfare for the benefit of the poor and landless
the 1987 philippine constitution also provides in article III (the bill of rights):
"Section 9. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation"
the constitutional basis for taking is simply and generally "public use"
the above gives you the legal basis for the act of the local government of paranaque
as to what is public use, we have jurisprudence on that matter
-
August 30th, 2005 10:55 PM #22
im also strongly opposed to opening private subdivisions to public access.
i don't live in a subdivision, pero para sa akin, it's a huge indication of the incompetence of government with traffic management. kung ang goal nila ay bumilis ang traffic flow at umikli ang commute times, e ang dami dami nilang pwedeng gawin na dapat naman talagang gawin matagal na (e.g., limiting PUVs on the roads, law enforcement, phasing out jeepneys, etc.). yung mga basic measures muna unahin nila bago mag "last resort" sa eminent domain.
can you imagine the hassle for subdivision residents? you paid good money for the security (which is another sign of the government's incompetence: kaya nauso yung mga subdivision kasi hindi makapagbigay ng adequate protection at convenience yung pamahalaan) and comfort of living in a subdivision, tapos bigla nalang nagising ka isang araw at nakakita ng invasion (in every sense of the word)?
worst thing pa, wala daw consultation with homeowners. WTF?
-
August 31st, 2005 02:30 AM #23
Originally Posted by 111prez
yun manggahan floodway dun sa Pasig dami din daw tinamaan na subdivision & homes to make way for the floodway, wala din nagawa considering si Imelda pa noon ang may project nito.
-
September 1st, 2005 10:58 AM #24
Just last night around 6:30pm, from toyota-standard up to elizalde-aguirre mga 45 mins and inabot ko. Grabe na patigasan ng BF at Munisipyo, kami napeperwisyo mga nakatira, yung mga stoplight minanduhan ng pulang pulis tapos yung makeshift na guardhouse along elizalde ginawang one lane yung daanan? Doble gastos pa commuters kasi they have to alight from the guardhouse para makasakay ulit dun sa kabila nito. Yung mga tricycle na walang bf sticker bumibyahe na hanggang dito na nuon eh hanggang phase 1 lang, kaya yung mga member ng tricycle nagtayo ng parang terminal dun sa may intersection ng concha cruz. Ang kapal nung mukha nung nagpalagay nung banner thanking mayor bernabe for opening the gates dun sa intersection ng elizalde eh ang trapik trapik nung oras na yun!
-
September 1st, 2005 11:03 AM #25
am wondering...
if more upscale subdivisions already opened up portions of their roads (e.g. white plains, green meadows, magallanes, etc) to traffic - why can't BF do the same?
-
September 1st, 2005 11:09 AM #26
kawawa naman ang mga taga BF
if this is the case, then they should also open up other subdivisions
examples are:
1. dasmarinas from mckinley to edsa/pasay road and chino roces (pasong tamo extension)
2. south forbes from mckinley to edsa/buendia
3. urdaneta village from paseo de roxas to buendia/edsa ramp
4. bel-air village from pases de roxas to estrella (near power plant)
then you really decongest the ridiculous makati city traffic
yung road from jp rizal to jupiter passing through santiago village, bel-air (II, ata) and crossing kalayaan (imelda) avenue) is open to the public but may mga guard houses pa rin
why limit it to bf homes?
-
couch potato
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 1,384
September 1st, 2005 11:11 AM #27akala ko ba one of the main reasons binuksan yung kalye kasi dahil sa mga complaints ng mga residents na abusado yung mga security ng bf .. kahit yung mga truck ng tubig ayaw papasukin kung hindi magbigay ng lagay sa security ..
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 109
September 1st, 2005 03:37 PM #28In my opinion, MBT is correct. The government should first exhaust all other measures before imposing to open up villages and subdivisions to the public. I am sure that if all the laws (such as limiting jeepneys, banning smoke belchers, etc. etc. etc.) were implemented properly there will be less traffic. If all laws were implemented properly and it still does not lessen traffic, then and only then should subdivisions and villages be opened to public subject to consultation with the residents. It is so unfair that people pay a premium (for security and privacy) to live in a subdivision or village only to have those privilages deprived from them because the government cannot enforce the laws that they wrote. That is the governments problem not the residents'.
The logic of some saying that more people will benefit from opening up subdivisions and villages to public traffic is not correct, in my opinion. This logic directly contradicts the very reason why people want to live in subdivisions. The people who want to pass through these villages can always get visitors stickers. They can have the convenience of passing thru as long as they pay the price. Residents have to pay for stickers to enter their own villages. Why do people think that the public should be able to enter without paying for stickers? The public is not banned from passing thru. They just have to get stickers. Simple. But why trash the whole idea of a subdivision/village and all it stands for just so people don't have to pass the long way simply because they don't want to pay for stickers? I for one respect the residents rights to privacy and security. I pay for stickers (even if they are expensive) if I want the privilage to pass through private property. It is the prerogative of these villages to charge for guest stickers. It is also their prerogative to charge as much as they want. It is up to the public to choose to pay for the right to pass thru or go around the long way.
No offense intended with my above opinions.
-
September 1st, 2005 05:15 PM #29
Originally Posted by mrpink
. Accdg. to the newspaper (PDI) the Mayor sent letters to all homeowners explaining the opening of the gates. This i've got to see pag-uwi pero dadaan na naman ako ng Concha Cruz, PUTIK trapik na naman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
September 1st, 2005 05:22 PM #30
yun bang ibang nearby subdivisions sa p'que eh open din to public yung roads nila? curious lang ako...