Results 2,721 to 2,730 of 4928
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 686
December 9th, 2015 12:08 AM #2721
-
December 9th, 2015 12:23 AM #2722
A jury is not a technical panel made up of experts, sadly. It comes down to who has the most convincing lawyers, in the end, in a civil case like this. The electronic pedal theory has never been proven to the satisfaction of any technical panel.
-
And it's incorrect to say the DOT found that pedal misapplication was the only culprit. Toyota USA was found to have issues with floormats and mechanical sticking of the pedals. They were fined epically because they took so long to admit the problem and issue a recall on those.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
December 9th, 2015 12:58 AM #2723The DOT concluded that, other than a number of incidents caused by accelerators hanging up on incorrectly fitted floor mats, the accidents were caused by drivers depressing their accelerators when they intended to apply their brakes. “Pedal misapplication” was the DOT’s delicate terminology for this phenomenon.
Last edited by ClaNker; December 9th, 2015 at 01:03 AM.
-
December 9th, 2015 02:10 AM #2724
No that is not the point. We do not wish anyone get killed by a faulty car. Just like everyone, we want to know the truth, we want everyone to live a happy and prosperous lives. But based on historical data, and your statement included, toyota has the worst safety record and has the most people killed compared to mitsubishi. And just recently, a congressman from quezon city, without proper investigation, who is riding the issue, to boost his poor popularity, wants to ban all montero sports in our streets??? what an *$#0£€!
-
December 9th, 2015 07:51 AM #2725
-
December 9th, 2015 08:11 AM #2726
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 48
December 9th, 2015 08:24 AM #2727
-
December 9th, 2015 08:31 AM #2728
Toyota knew of the sticky pedal problem a year before the SUA cases blew up... Rather call an outright recall, they hid it until it became too obvious,
The problem had surfaced in Toyota vehicles in Europe in 2008, causing instances of uncontrolled acceleration. In early 2009, the company gave European Toyota distributors information about the sticky pedals along with instructions to replace them if customers complained.
Meanwhile, rather than issuing a recall, the company quietly directed its pedal supplier to change parts in Europe and made plans to roll out the same change in the United States.
By then, the problem had already cropped up in cars sold in the United States, according to the documents. At nearly the same time as the highly publicized San Diego accident, Toyota staffers sent a memo to the company’s headquarters in Japan warning of an unintended-acceleration problem apart from the one caused by the floor mats.
For several months, Toyota received more evidence of the pedal problem and quietly made plans to address it without informing federal safety officials as required by law. Concerned that federal officials would learn about these plans, the company canceled the change in pedal design and communicated that change orally rather than in writing, so there would be no paper trail.
After more instances of sticky pedals came to the company’s attention in 2009, executives decided to disclose the issue to federal regulators and issue a new recall. But the deception did not end there. After the recall was completed, the company produced an inaccurate timeline and submitted it to federal regulators and Congress, making it appear as if the company had acted quickly to address the sticky-pedal issue.
“Rather than promptly disclosing and correcting safety issues about which they were aware, Toyota made misleading public statements to consumers and gave inaccurate facts to members of Congress,” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said at a news conference announcing the settlement.
-
December 9th, 2015 08:50 AM #2729
Of course you want to know the truth. "Driver error yan."
Ilang ang SUA cases ng Montero before this blew out of proportion? Ilang ang SUA cases that resulted to buy back?
Kelan ang unang reported case ng Montero, at kelan ang unang buy back case nila? Then kelan sila ng nag lagay ng shift lock?
Sino ang hinarap ng Montero sa public? Abogado nila. You want to know the truth, right?
-
December 9th, 2015 08:53 AM #2730
This is the encouragement that I was (vainly) trying to rub on their upper management in my letter to them,- as they have been maliciously maligned by that particular station, at least for those where they have "visual proof".
I was telling them too, that their unblemished reputation is their foremost responsibility to themselves, and their stakeholders, which includes their current and future customers.
I surmised that they don't want any ruffled feathers anywhere....
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" LJIOHF!
28.3K _/_/_/_/_/:santa:_/_/_/_/_/
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines