Results 1 to 10 of 636
-
March 13th, 2007 04:03 PM #1
It seems we don't have a pc/console gaming thread. kung meron paki-merge na lang. simulan ko lang for the young and the young at heart
PS2's swan song....... GOD of WAR II
IGN : "9.7/10"
Gamespot: "9.2/10"
Gamespy: "5/5"
Gamepro: "4.9/5"
plot
The plot involves Kratos meddling with humans too much especially the people of Sparta, his hometown. This angered Zeus, so when Kratos goes against the will of the gods to help out good ol' Sparta, Zeus takes the opportunity to rob Kratos of his godly powers by trapping them within the Blade of Olympus.
release date: today!
kailan kaya magkakaroon nito sa tabi-tabi?
-
March 13th, 2007 04:19 PM #2
The traditional flight/combat sim is an endangered species destined to be replaced by arcade-ish ones *sob*
Here's an ode to a bygone era with pics from Janes WW2 Fighters, MS Combat Flight Simulator 2, and Pacific Fighters:
-
Tsikot Member Rank 3
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 2,053
March 13th, 2007 04:57 PM #3
-
March 13th, 2007 10:34 PM #4
-
March 14th, 2007 03:08 AM #5
WW2 is my favorite simulation setting, preferably the Pacific Theater. It's my favorite because there's such a marked contrast in aircraft capabilities and tactics used between the Japanese and the Allies.
In the European and Mediterranean Theaters, aircraft are more evenly matched which is ok. In the Eastern Front, it's qualitative (Axis) vs quantitative (Russians) which is almost as fascinating as the Pacific Theater.
I need a new set of rudder pedals since my old CH pedals finally died.....
-
March 14th, 2007 03:40 AM #6
I forgot to add that I tend to play flight sims for a long time. WW2 Fighters date back from 1999. MS CFS2 dates back to 2000. I also have MS CFS3 (ETO). But, it isn't like CFS2 at all. I much prefer IL2/Forgotten Battles over CFS3. Between Pacific Fighters and MS CFS2..... I like the flight models of PF better. But, MS CFS2 seems to have captured the Pacific sea/ocean colors, clouds, and island terrain better which makes it more immersive to me.
-
Tsikot Member Rank 3
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 2,053
March 15th, 2007 02:55 PM #7I prefer the western European theater, especially the English Channel area. The sceneries are nice (good mix of water and land) and I love reliving the BF109E vs Spit MkII.
Of all the WW2 combat flight sims I have, I loved Microprose's EAW the most.
Followed closely by Rowans BoB (after all the bug fixes). Though IL2 is clearly superior to both, somehow for me, IL2 didn't have the "soul" that EAW and BoB had. (Also.. I suck so bad at IL2. Hehehehe... I got fixated at the easy flight model of EAW and BoB)
I don't have rudder pedals though... I have to make do with a twist rudder joystick (Wingman Strike Force).
-
-
March 15th, 2007 04:10 PM #9
I still have EAW here. Before EAW and 3d-acceleration, Microprose had 1942: Pacific Air War (1994). Although lo-res and no 3d-acceleration, it had textured-mapping which made it look pretty good. It had a decent flight model with a propensity to send the player into some nasty stalls. It also had a patch that made the AI some of the nastiest I've ever seen. Zeros were tenacious for getting on your six and if you're caught without energy to dive away like near sea level, you're a goner. I haven't seen any AI that good since except for human players.
That was probably the best flight sim I've ever played in any computer. Too bad Microprose isn't around anymore...
-
March 15th, 2007 07:20 PM #10
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines