Results 561 to 570 of 3645
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 2,719
-
September 7th, 2013 09:22 AM #562
Purported interview going around the web...
JEAN NAPOLES INTERVIEW INSIDE HER LIMOUSINE (Los Angeles, CA)
REPORTER : How do you feel about your mom now in custody by the DILG ?
JEAN : Nothing much, mom knows how to take care of business. She’ll go over it !
REPORTER : Aren’t you worried that all your wealth be held in abeyance while she’s being investigated ?
JEAN : Not really … we have more than enough.
REPORTER : Do you think she’s going to jail ?
JEAN : Well … I think they need her more than she needs them. They were never enemies of the President and Mar Roxas, they were like a family when PNoy was a Congressman-Senator & Mar a Senator then, there’s no axe to grind against her.
REPORTER : What are your parting words ?
JEAN : I love my mother, my country and my countrymen as well. It is not our fault if we are wealthy or is it neither our fault if we have lots and lots of friends, including the Senators, Congressmen, Cabinet Members and even the President himself. All I can say to those who want to pin down and insult my mom to be very careful and go easy on her and never to underestimate her, because she is a very talented person that can be an angry tiger if pushed to the wall ! Thank you !
-
September 7th, 2013 09:51 AM #563Revilla lawyer: Charges all lies
‘Senator denounces trial by publicity’
By Norman Bordadora
Philippine Daily Inquirer
1:15 am | Saturday, September 7th, 2013
SAY CHEESE Sen. Ramon Revilla Jr. and his wife, Cavite Rep. Lani Mercado (center), share party time with Janet Lim-Napoles, the alleged woman on top of the P10-billion pork scandal, and husband Jimmy during the wedding of Rep. Roman Romulo and Shalani Soledad early last year. Napoles was one of the Romulos’ 22 wedding sponsors. CONTRIBUTED PHOTO
The lawyer of Sen. Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. on Friday branded as “lies” the allegations made against the legislator by whistle-blowers in the P10-billion pork barrel scam even as Revilla continues to avoid making an appearance at the Senate blue ribbon committee inquiry into the scandal.
Lawyer Joel Bodegon said Revilla would continue to refrain from attending the Senate hearings as he felt that “it is inappropriate for him to appear” before the investigation panel chaired by Sen. Teofisto Guingona III.
“Senator Revilla reiterates that he is as much interested to know the truth as anyone else, that is why he is continuing with his own investigation of all the allegations against him,” he added.
Revilla and two other senators, Juan Ponce Enrile and Jinggoy Estrada, were tagged by witnesses at the blue-ribbon committee hearings as among the lawmakers who endorsed dubious nongovernment organizations (NGOs) to be recipients of tens of millions of pesos of their Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) entitlements.
The witnesses—former heads of government-owned and -controlled corporations (GOCCs) that served as conduits for the pork barrel to the questionable NGOs—corroborated the testimony of Commission on Audit (COA) Chair Grace Pulido-Tan who testified on the results of the COA special audit of pork barrel releases from 2007 to 2009.
Aside from the testimony of former GOCC heads Salvador Salacup of ZNAC Rubber Estates Corp. and Alan Javellana of National Agribusiness Corp. at the Senate inquiry on Thursday that Revilla, Enrile and Estrada had endorsed questionable NGOs, including those of Napoles, several whistle-blowers have also identified the three legislators as among those who gave their PDAF to the dubious groups.
“[Senator Revilla] denounces the trial by publicity as a derogation of his constitutional right to due process of law,” Bodegon said.
“He is appalled at how the media are giving unwarranted credence to the lies purveyed by the whistle-blowers who have publicly confessed their criminal enterprise of stealing the lawmakers’ PDAF,” he said.
The lawyer said Revilla was currently securing documents related to the PDAF disbursements to have their authenticity verified.
A former GOCC vice president also told the Senate hearing on Thursday that Revilla, Enrile and Estrada signed the document four times covering one such fund release to an NGO. The funds were released in four tranches as part of the alleged safeguards against abuses.
“Currently, he is having all the documents which appear to bear his signatures for expert examination, especially because the whistle-blowers themselves said they faked the documents,” Bodegon said.
Even the alleged scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles has denied having any transactions with Revilla, the lawyer said.
Asked when Revilla would face his colleagues concerning the allegations against him, Bodegon said the matter was “under advisement.”
“He wants the committee to conduct its hearing without being inhibited by his presence,” Bodegon said, when asked why Revilla continues to inhibit himself from the proceedings.
Meanwhile, neophyte Sen. JV Ejercito wants the COA to cast a wider net in its audit of pork barrel releases to identify others who could have been involved in the scam, other than opposition leaders Enrile and Estrada.
Ejercito, a half-brother of Estrada (the two are sons of deposed President Joseph Estrada, who is now mayor of Manila), said there could also be “other Napoleses” with the same modus operandi, securing pork barrel kickbacks for themselves and for corrupt lawmakers.
“It has been mentioned quite often three members of our colleagues (sic),” Ejercito said at the Senate hearing on Thursday, apparently referring to Estrada, Enrile and Revilla.
Ejercito, a former congressman representing San Juan, said there had to be more individuals operating the same way as Napoles.
“We are zeroing in on Napoles NGOs in this hearing, but with your indulgence, I would like to ask the COA or [the Department of Agriculture] or whoever, are there other Napoleses operating this way? Because there can’t only be one,” he said.
Ejercito told the committee that during his stint in the House, “there are times there are a lot of beautiful ladies around (sic).”
“We called them ‘livelihood girls’ because they were peddling livelihood projects,” he said, indicating that the women were asking lawmakers if they could fund the projects with their PDAF for possible kickbacks for both the proponents and the lawmakers.
Read more: Revilla lawyer: Charges all lies | Inquirer News
Follow us: *inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
-
-
September 7th, 2013 09:57 AM #565
-
-
September 7th, 2013 10:40 AM #567
Honor amongst thieves. They're doing their best not to rat each other out.
-
September 7th, 2013 10:54 AM #568
the ultimate goal of the senators is to get their hands on the pork funds
so naturally they would make sure from the very start the NGOs that receive pork funds will remit the money back to them
that involves a lot of trust
so it's freaking unbelieveable that the senators don't know Napoles. they HAVE TO know her coz they're trusting her with billions of pesos
forged signatures? wouldnt the senators know agad if their pork funds go missing?
the ultimate incentive in being a senator IS ACCESS TO PORK FUNDS. they must be watching those funds like hungry salivating dogs. tapos hahayaan lang nila i-forge ang pirma nila at manakaw ang pera?Last edited by uls; September 7th, 2013 at 10:58 AM.
-
September 7th, 2013 11:17 AM #569
You can forge signatures all you want. At the end of the day, it's the senator's job to check where all his pork went.
If I was responsible for over a hundred million pesos in cash, no way in hell would I not ask if fifty million of it went missing at the end of t year.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
September 7th, 2013 11:18 AM #570
No way that came from the real daughter, too smart and damaging answers. What i think is they will all be quiet and speak nothing.
This is nothing but a prank internet posting to spread intrigue.
What if we forge into their personal bank accounts and see whether they answer the same way. These unhonarable senators always think they can out smart every juan dela cruz.