Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 120
June 4th, 2013 04:49 PM #1I'm thinking of getting an X-trail over CR-V. What are the differences between these 2 models aside from the obvious 2.0 and 2.5. I tried searching but I can't find any info. Thanks in advance.
-
June 4th, 2013 05:00 PM #2
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 120
-
June 4th, 2013 05:57 PM #4
The bigger engine and CVT tranny is worth that much. CVT is supposed to improve fuel efficiency. I am not sure what the FC figures for the new Xtrail with its 2.5L engine and CVT tranny but the older gen 2.0L Xtrail was averaging between 6-7 Km/L on city driving conditions, as per inputs from some members here.
Last edited by Egan101; June 4th, 2013 at 06:20 PM.
-
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 120
June 5th, 2013 11:08 AM #6Thanks! Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but is the 2.5L worth getting over CR-V 2.0 and Kia Sorento?
-
June 5th, 2013 11:30 AM #7
You can do a comparison of specs using Autoindustriya's buyers guide. The 5-seater Sorento is a good deal of sorts since Kia dropped its price for it.
2013 New Car Buyers Guide
-
June 5th, 2013 11:52 AM #8
mga magkano na un Sorento nyan ngayon sir? dun sa guide sa 1.7M, un CRV 190nm torque while un Xtrail 230nm torque, ang layo ng gap :D
-
June 5th, 2013 12:48 PM #9
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 754
June 18th, 2013 08:22 PM #10From my experience, the Xtrail CVT is more fuel efficient in highways than the 1st gen but for city, the first gen is better. I only ave 5.6km/L in my Xtrail CVT in pure city driving but 8km/L in highway with hataw. But for the 200k, it's worth it since the interiors are designed better with plenty of soft plastics, better quality buttons and better NVH. The only thing I miss on the first gen Xtrail is the softer suspension, softer seats and longer legroom for the driver side. You can test drive both to see which you prefer.