Results 1 to 10 of 31
-
March 9th, 2011 02:57 PM #1
100% support !!!
http://pidibarzaga.com/downloads/hb_1087.pdf
HOUSE BILL NO. _02145
Introduced by HON. MA. AMELITA CALIMBAS-VILLAROSA
AN ACT AMENDING REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8368, OTHERWISE KNOWN
AS THE “ANTI-SQUATTING LAW REPEAL ACT OF 1997”
Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives
of the Philippines in Congress so assembled.
SECTION 1. This Act shall be known as the “Revised Anti-Squatting
Law of 2005”.
SECTION 2. Section 4 of Republic Act No. 8368 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Section 4. Effect on Republic Act No. 7279. – Nothing
herein shall be construed to nullify, eliminate or diminish in any
way Section 27 of Republic Act No. 7279 or any of its provisions
relative to sanctions against professional squatters and
squatting syndicates. Provided, that any person or group of
persons who, with the use of force, intimidation or threat, or
taking advantage of the absence or tolerance of the landowner,
succeeds in occupying or possessing the property of the latter
against his will, and, having received a written demand to either
vacate or pay rent from said landowner, shall refuse to do so
within a period of ninety (90) days, shall be considered a
professional squatter within the purview of Republic Act No.
7279.Last edited by Monseratto; March 9th, 2011 at 03:02 PM.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 46
-
diretsahan lang
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 627
March 9th, 2011 03:40 PM #3MABUHAY!!!!!!
ito ang tama.
bakit ba naman kase me mambabatas pa nagpasa ng RA 8368?
"The time has come to revisit Republic Act No. 8368 to evaluate the
merits and demerits of a popular statute that purportedly upheld the rights ofreal property owners" -MA. AMELITA CALIMBAS-VILLAROSA
the less fortunate but at the great expense of the equally important rights of
mabuhay ka madam congresswoman!
-
diretsahan lang
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 627
March 9th, 2011 03:51 PM #4MABUHAY!!!!!!
ito ang tama.
bakit ba naman kase me mambabatas pa nagpasa ng RA 8368?
"The time has come to revisit Republic Act No. 8368 to evaluate the
merits and demerits of a popular statute that purportedly upheld the rights ofreal property owners" -MA. AMELITA CALIMBAS-VILLAROSA
the less fortunate but at the great expense of the equally important rights of
mabuhay ka madam congresswoman!
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Posts
- 46
March 9th, 2011 03:57 PM #5but i think this bill is still pending, sana bigyan priority itong batas na ito...
-
March 9th, 2011 04:28 PM #6
May hearing this afternoon regarding this bill. Guess sino nasa labas gumagawa ng trapik at tumututol dito...
-
March 9th, 2011 04:32 PM #7
sana nga bigyan priority ito...
saan kaya lilipat itong mga squatter kapag pinaalis na sa lupang hindi sa kanila?.... malamang lilipat sa ibang lugar, palipat-lipat lang...
-
March 9th, 2011 04:47 PM #8
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBrc-4eRnUo]Caritas at Maralita on proposed anti-squatting law -March 5, 2011 [/ame]
-
March 9th, 2011 05:14 PM #9
Very good..
But in reality, pano mo papaalisin? Si ayala nga di makaporma sa trinoma, pano yung ordinaryong middle class na tao na nagmana ng malaking lupain sa lolo nilang mayamanLast edited by oliver1013; March 9th, 2011 at 05:17 PM.
-
Why so butthurt?
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 1,093
March 9th, 2011 05:20 PM #10They don't respect other people's rights?
Then the state doesn't need to respect their human rights.
Hose them down.
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines