Quote Originally Posted by badsekktor View Post
I am refering to the apprehension itself. I believe that LEOs cannot afford to drive around just to apprehend those who have those kind of lights.

And again, that is subjective, You need to have a common baseline para masabi na patas para sa lahat. Like yun case ng wang-wang.... it is obvious for them to know kung nagviolate kagad yun sasakyan or like yun blinkers...

Yun lighting kasi, ano ang baseline kung ilan lumens? and how are they going to gauge that to say that there is a violation?

hindi naman pwedeng gawin nilang violation kapag HID ang gamit mo na lighting? paano na yun mga models na standard ang HID? yan ang mahirap diyan? yun IRR at kung ano ang ilalagay nila diyan
common baseline? read my previous post. as i said, pag nakakasilaw, except for high beam, violation na agad. nang matuto. ticketan na agad. alam naman siguro ng mga authorities kung anu ang nakakasilaw sa hindi.

about HID, "most" oem HID equipt vehicles dont glare. why? "most" are equipped with proper projector kits and properly adjusted etc etc etc. except for those a-holes improperly adjusted their kits.

those hid a-holes that glares oppositely approaching vehicles are "mostly" aftermarket without proper projector kits and improperly adjusted. and sa di maipaliwanag na kadahilanan, insensitive sila!

and about sa equipment for the glaring violation you said, gastos lang yan. baka pagkakitaan pa yan ng gobyerno, overpricing (i hope Pnoy will be different). simpleng speed gun (basta yung ginagamit sa pagmeasure ng speed) halos wala ata ang pulis,(never seen one police officer equipped with a speed gun) which is more useful if ever.but what the hell, heavy traffic is common in the metro.