Results 31 to 40 of 44
-
November 15th, 2011 04:49 PM #31
Years ago, at the height of the Auto-LPG convertion adaption, the government (under PGMA) released a few million pesos to convert jeepneys to Auto-LPG. Unfortunately, over 60% went straight into the pockets of the government officials, leaving very little to fund the actual jeepney conversion project.
-
November 15th, 2011 04:53 PM #32
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 6,235
November 15th, 2011 06:18 PM #33Headlights AND taillights. I once rear ended a jeepney because he stopped abruptly to let down passengers. Thank God the passenger hadn't started to dismount yet.
Disaster happened due to rainy weather and the fact that his taillights either weren't working or haven't been switched on. I noticed that all jeepneys seem to have working taillights at night but close to none have working taillights in the daytime.
-
November 15th, 2011 06:32 PM #34
-
November 20th, 2011 01:29 PM #35
I'm currently living in a country where LPG as an automotive fuel is officially forbidden (Brazil), altough some outlaw conversions are still performed mainly in the countryside. However, CNG (a.k.a. methane gas or "biomethane") is widely used in taxis since Diesel fuel usage is limited to some vehicle classes due to either payload or traction systems. I have ridden some outlaw LPG-powered cars that used home LPG bottles but hadn't any problem with LPG leaks inside the cab, altough it's also blended with a sulphur compound to get smelly and ease the detection of a leak. As long as safety goes, it depends more on how the setup was installed than any other factor, and some commercial operators usually get the cheaper setups (often not the most suitables to the kind of vehicle) and cheaper services (not everytime so well performed)...
-
February 8th, 2012 03:29 PM #36
Gentlemen:
Truth be told, using jeepney's as public transportation was a stop-gap improvisation made possible the the abundant supply of ex-US Army Jeeps leftover from the 2nd World War and a lack of other alternatives.
Now that better more economical, more environmentally-clean alternatives are available, there is really no good reason to keep them in operation.
There is no way that they can easily be made safe and clean nor economical - there are too many constraints - we should look for better alternatives.
We should lobby to phase out the jeepney's and their reckless drivers, its time for better public transport, NO OTHER COUNTRY in the world uses them.
As to the problems with LPG smell, health, etc., well LPG like most industrial gases is mixed with an ODORANT - a very small amount of a different gas with a powerful smell that tells the user that there is a LEAK - it is a standard procedure when handling industrial gases - as LPG itself has NO SMELL.
Usually the gas used is the cheapest available at the refinery - that usually means no one want's it - usually because it's toxic and corrosive (think sulfur dioxide, ethanthiol etc).
Prolonged exposure to such a gas will produce the adverse health risks that are widely reported, what is important to remember is that this is not due to any problem with LPG per se, but a result of LEAKS in the system.
So badly installed LPG systems will leak into the vehicle and slowly make you sick... same for any poorly made system.
Best Regards,
Dusky Lim
-
February 8th, 2012 03:51 PM #37
who's gonna bring up the subject of phasing out of PUJs?
which politician? who's brave enough? it's political suicide. it's too anti-poor
-
February 8th, 2012 04:32 PM #38
*Dusky
The issue with jeepneys is obvious. Its inefficient, old and unsafe. Best to have it replaced with safer and more efficient replacements, might those replacements be ejeepneys, mini-buses, etc. it doesn't matter.
But to the masses, it's a matter of earning a living at a level they can sustain. To most of the jeepney drivers and operators, buying a new vehicle is out of the question. So the only ones who can do it would be the "rich" companies. So to the "poor", this will become a pro-rich movement. Hence the subject is too hot for any politician to tackle if they want to have a long political future.
The only way to get jeepneys off the road will be an eventual process where there would be some unnoticed government move to make it prohibitive to register, purchase, maintain jeepneys as a whole.
-
February 8th, 2012 05:48 PM #39
ya there are clean alternatives available
look at the electric jeepney. the goal was to replace PUJs. how'd that go?
how about those brand new million peso Isuzu elf mini buses that were supposed to replace PUJs? how'd that go? meron ba jeepney operator nag loan sa bangko para bumili ng elf bus?
people who think they can sell PUJ operators electric jeepneys and million peso minibuses aren't in touch with reality
-
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines