Ranger XL 4x4 vs Jimny

[Vodka]

gonna be a toy, not a daily driver. prices are very very similar but the ranger is a lot bigger car so you get a lot more metal for the money

as a ford owner i know firsthand that the quality of the components/suppliers aren't that great but if you don't beat the cr*p out of the car it'll serve you OK for 10 or 12 years. then the resale value is totally rubbish

the jimny is a lot smaller and less safe (less airbags, less mass, less crash structure). but it'll probably last 20yrs

[kagalingan]

ako jimny bagay sa akin kasi slim ako.

And sobra eye catcher na number1 sa looks tinalo na coolray and juke.

problema sa jimny pag chubby/taba mukhang sardinas.

[thearsenal1205]

Why not hilux 4x4 j instead? Or a navara mt 4x4?

Sent from my SM-S901E using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[Vodka]

Why not hilux 4x4 j instead? Or a navara mt 4x4?

Sent from my SM-S901E using Tsikot Forums mobile app

hilux j 4x4 is super bare. doesn't even have power windows

navarra ve 4x4 m/t is around 1.4m. really don't wanna pay that for an m/t

[Dr.Kamiya]

For a toy I'd vote Jimny too.

For off road it will be just as, if not more capable than many full size SUVs. Small size means it can go through places where the Ranger will scrape, and will have better approach, breakover, and departure angles. Solid axles front and rear pa.

Looks wise Jimny gets the win as well. Boxy classic look will age well.

Only place where Ranger gets the advantage is practicality, but you did say it was a toy and not a workhorse.

[kagalingan]

analyze ko mga naka jimny. Ito ang iiwasan nyo mabangga magasgasan kasi grabe kaselan yan owner. Sobra kintab pintura and yung gulong ginastusan talaga and all the suspension modification. Its like the craze ng s.i.r pero external not engine.

may nakita na ba kayo hataw harurot nagdrive na jimny eh foh sho waley pa. Ingat na ingat yan.

Ilan kpl ng jimny pag provinsya highway?

[viper888]

The Jimny has a secondary use as a city car. It can fit in tight parking buildings with steep ramps.

Whereas a Ranger is just long.

The resale value of a Jimny is pretty high, but so would a barely used ranger.

I'd pick the Jimny as a toy as well.

[travajante]

Jimny by miles as both a toy & a non-human hauler daily. It's fun, easy, worry-free, reliable & goes anywhere. Have had some time caring for a 43 & building a 74. They were an epiphany of sorts. The Jimny's actually a very practical 2nd car.[emoji4]

Sent from my SM-S901E using Tsikot Forums mobile app

[Vodka]

For a toy I'd vote Jimny too.

For off road it will be just as, if not more capable than many full size SUVs. Small size means it can go through places where the Ranger will scrape, and will have better approach, breakover, and departure angles. Solid axles front and rear pa.

Looks wise Jimny gets the win as well. Boxy classic look will age well.

Only place where Ranger gets the advantage is practicality, but you did say it was a toy and not a workhorse.

yeah i don't even need the ranger's bed(tub) coz i got a cargo trailer. it's a lot easier to load a trailer that's like a foot off the ground, than to lift all the stuff up a really tall 4x4 truck

[ice15]

gonna be a toy, not a daily driver. prices are very very similar but the ranger is a lot bigger car so you get a lot more metal for the money

as a ford owner i know firsthand that the quality of the components/suppliers aren't that great but if you don't beat the cr*p out of the car it'll serve you OK for 10 or 12 years. then the resale value is totally rubbish

the jimny is a lot smaller and less safe (less airbags, less mass, less crash structure). but it'll probably last 20yrs

ilan ang passengers mo?

kami kasi, 80% of the time, 3 palagi. I find the rear seat of the Jimny useless so definitely kung para sa akin, di kami magkasya sa Jimny (wife and daughter are both 5'7)