Help me choose my next M-SUV Trailblazer or MU-X

**enterbay** · October 30th, 2014 07:11 PM

Hi guys! I need your input. Kung may budget ka na 1.4M, alin sa dalawa ang pipiliin nyo? MU-X or Trailblazer? Why? Pros and Cons of each. Salamat mga ka-tsikot!

**Newcomer123** · October 30th, 2014 08:07 PM

Mu-x for urban cruising, light duty climbing and family hauling. Totl entertainment for backriders and full safety features found only in much more expensive vehicles. If your intention is as an Innova or Sportivo upgrade/replacement, here's the better alternative.

Trailblazer 4x2 for all of the above and more serious hauling and climbing duties due to its more massive engine though in M/T only. Add another 100k for a/t but with even bigger engine. But that's way more than your budget allows. If you prefer it fast and loud, the TBs the way to go

Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

**StockEngine** · October 30th, 2014 08:17 PM

With the worsening traffic in beautiful metro manila...mux. tb is nice but when you drive 99% in manila...kahit 140kph sa edsa doable naman with the mux. Dont drive like me. Lol

Climbing and hauling? parang ang hirap umakyat ng mga turbo diesel. O baka driver fault. Lol

**crosswind** · October 30th, 2014 08:36 PM

Mu-x
Fc is the best in its class 35 liters hanggang Bicol
Features like push start hindi mo na kailangan ipasko ang susi
TCS and ECS
4wd is a winner if they put the 3.0 engine
quieter than the trailblazer

Trailblazer
bigger engine

paper specs don't prove everything

to drive is to believe
test drive the two vehicles first

**glenn_duke** · October 30th, 2014 11:26 PM

Originally Posted by crosswind

Mu-x
Fc is the best in its class 35 liters hanggang Bicol

Ano details nung 35 liters up to Bicol?

From Manila to Naga ?
from Manila to Legaspi ?
From Manila to Matnog ?

**jut703** · October 31st, 2014 03:47 AM

35L for Manila to Naga is only 11 km/L. I've used far less with my Ranger - 28L from Manila to Naga (13.7 km/L, 385 km).

More impressive if Manila to Legaspi (13.7 km/L, 480 km trip). Matnog is another 100 km - I think it's impossible to do 16.5 km/L especially with the road condition in Quezon right now.

Posted via Tsikot Mobile App

**andrewnathaniel** · October 31st, 2014 08:55 AM

You may refer to this thread for more info.

http://tsikot.com/forums/car-compari...er-mu-x-99518/

**andrewnathaniel** · October 31st, 2014 09:11 AM

kung sa looks mas gusto ko itsura ng front ng MU-X, yung side naman at rear halos identical na sila eh. Saka parang mas reliable yung mga makina ng Isuzu compared sa chevy (guess ko lang), pero yung build quality as per Isuzu thread parang medyo bagsak, ewan ko lang kung dahil sa 1st batch ng release ng unit kaya ganun.

kung engine naman ang paguusapan, okay na yang MU-X, sobrang lakas na naman nung 200HP, ang dami ngang nagkalat sa kalsada na D4D engine (102 HP) okay na ang ganung power yan pa bang 134 HP (MU-X)

**crosswind** · October 31st, 2014 09:34 AM

Originally Posted by glenn_duke

Ano details nung 35 liters up to Bicol?

From Manila to Naga ?
from Manila to Legaspi ?
From Manila to Matnog ?

Makati to Legaspi bro
kwento saakin sa casa
sila kasi nagdedeliver pagwalang
truck carrier
siguro todo harurot mga yun
baka kung normal 100-80 kph
baka mas mababa na consume na liters ng diesel

**glenn_duke** · October 31st, 2014 10:58 AM

Originally Posted by crosswind

Makati to Legaspi bro
kwento saakin sa casa
sila kasi nagdedeliver pagwalang
truck carrier
siguro todo harurot mga yun
baka kung normal 100-80 kph
baka mas mababa na consume na liters ng diesel

Ok, so sobra palang 100 kph ang average na takbo nila kaya conservative pa yung 35 liters (13.5km/l)
Sa ganyang bilis, malamang kinuha lang nila ng under 5 hours yung Makati to Lepaspi.