2006 Pajero CK 3.8 V6 vs 2012 Forester 2.0

**Walter** · April 8th, 2017 05:17 PM

Originally Posted by GTi

😆😆 Pampagulo lang since you mentioned that this is an interim vehicle and that you are getting a new Everest soon.

27 Suzuki Grand Vitara alt 29 21 211 | ******* 2.7V6 engine, 4x4, proper ladder frame chassis, seems to be in good condition and at only 300+k. Since you spent less getting this, you'd be getting your new Everest sooner...?

Hmmmmm ... worth considering ... cheaper than the Pajero V6 ... but the driving dynamics of this one is not so good ... is it?

*Stockengine ... yeah, it came with a V6 before ...

**GTi** · April 8th, 2017 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Walter

Hmmmmm ... worth considering ... cheaper than the Pajero V6 ... but the driving dynamics of this one is not so good ... is it?

*Stockengine ... yeah, it came with a V6 before ...

Likely not as sporty as the Forester but should still be better than the more cumbersome Pajero. The 2.7V6 should give decent gas mileage, especially with your expected usage, probably not far off from a typical 2.4L 4 pot.

Our '04 Accord 3.0V6 was able to do 10km/L in a Baguio trip. I doubt the Pajero would be able to manage the same having lesser horses, more displacement and more weight.

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk