New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 247 of 307 FirstFirst ... 147197237243244245246247248249250251257297 ... LastLast
Results 2,461 to 2,470 of 3070
  1. Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,767
    #2461
    Quote Originally Posted by ssaloon View Post
    How's the interface? Snappy and no lag when cycling through the menu?
    Good interface. Snappy and no lag. I also want to correct the CPU is Octa-core. I connected 500GB external HDD to USB port and it works. Loaded with music and movies.

    Sent from my ASUS_Z010D using Tapatalk

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    258
    #2462
    Hi Sound guru's, I've been following this thread from quite sometime now and I have learned a lot for my sound set up.

    Hingi sana ako ng tulong nyo. I am currently using Focal 165FX on my mid, avh595BT HU, DLS P40amp and Kicker Comp R 12" (planning to replace soon) with 10" maybe JL or focal sub. I am leaning through SQ which I am now satisfied with these set up after learning on a hard way. Because I started my set up using LL 4ch and mono amp, pioneer seps and the Kicker sub. Which were all disposed and now changed to focal 165fx and DLS amp only, except for the kicker sub which I like to sell also soon.

    Now, my question is it is worth putting a PC 165F (coaxial) to the back seat (dont know what does it called) where the stocks speaker was installed. The stock speaker was still there but was not wired, meaning hindi siya pinagana ng installer ko. I just want to know kung mag improve pa and sound quality and listening pleasure especially to my passengers if I install a coaxial speaker in that location? or better stay on my current set up and spend my extra bucks in replacing my subs into a compatible SQ set up? BTW, my car is a vios sedan.

    Thanks in advance for those who will give advise and critics.

  3. Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,138
    #2463
    ^I'd skip the coaxials. Does your HU have time alignment? This is to enable your installer to manually tune your ride to have multiple optimized listening positions. This is what I miss in Alpine's Audyssey, where you can easily do that. If that feature is not available, an external processor will help.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    47
    #2464
    Hi guys.hoping you could help me decide which amp to get since my friend is in the u.s. til next week and i can order online. Im choosing between (3)4ch amps and both are priced almost the same except for the 3rd.($100 cheaper)

    1. Hertz HCP4d (class d) 1,100watts
    Channel mode 4 - 3 - 2 Output Power (RMS) * 14.4 VDC 4 Ch: 85 W x 4 (4 Ω) 4 Ch: 145 W x 4 (2 Ω) 3 Ch: 85 W x 2 (4 Ω) + 290 W x 1 (4 Ω) 3 Ch: 145 W x 2 (2 Ω) + 290 W x 1 (4 Ω) 2 Ch: 290 W x 2 (4 Ω) Filters Bypass Hi-Pass Lo-Pass Band-Pass Yes A/B: 50 ÷ 3.2k Hz * 12 dB/Oct. A/B: 50 ÷ 3.2k Hz * 12 dB/Oct. - Distortion - THD (100Hz * 4Ω) 0.02% S/N Ratio (A weighted * 1V) 100 dB Damping factor (100Hz * 4Ω) 200

    2. RF Punch 600x4 (AB)-800+watts
    4-channel car amplifier
    75 watts RMS x 4 at 4 ohms (150 watts RMS x 4 at 2 ohms)
    300 watts RMS x 2 bridged at 4 ohms (4-ohm stable in bridged mode)

    3. Hertz HCP4-740watts
    Channel mode 4 - 3 - 2 Output Power (RMS) * 14.4 VDC 4 Ch: 65 W x 4 (4 Ω) 4 Ch: 95 W x 4 (2 Ω) 3 Ch: 65 W x 2 (4 Ω) + 190 W x 1 (4 Ω) 3 Ch: 95 W x 2 (2 Ω) + 190 W x 1 (4 Ω) 2 Ch: 190 W x 2 (4 Ω) Filters Bypass Hi-Pass Lo-Pass Band-Pass Yes A/B: 80 Hz * 12 dB/Oct. A/B: 50 ÷ 500 Hz * 12 dB/Oct. - Distortion - THD (100Hz * 4Ω) 0.01% S/N Ratio (A weighted * 1V) 103 dB Damping factor (100Hz * 4Ω) 120 Size W x D x H mm (in.) 315 x 190 x 50 (12.40 x 7.48 x 1.97)

    *3rd amp is cheaper by $100

    My next plan is to buy the stuff locally:
    1. Seps( morel tempo, hertz esk, or rainbow slc)
    2. DSP since i dont want to change current hu of 2017 civic
    3. 10-12inch sealed sub


    Will do the others pa isa isa(So wife wont be shocked)

    What amp would you suggest? I usually listen to alternative/progressive rock, electronic and jazz.

    Thanks
    Cls




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,527
    #2465
    Quote Originally Posted by cls View Post
    Hi guys.hoping you could help me decide which amp to get since my friend is in the u.s. til next week and i can order online. Im choosing between (3)4ch amps and both are priced almost the same except for the 3rd.($100 cheaper)

    1. Hertz HCP4d (class d) 1,100watts
    Channel mode 4 - 3 - 2 Output Power (RMS) * 14.4 VDC 4 Ch: 85 W x 4 (4 Ω) 4 Ch: 145 W x 4 (2 Ω) 3 Ch: 85 W x 2 (4 Ω) + 290 W x 1 (4 Ω) 3 Ch: 145 W x 2 (2 Ω) + 290 W x 1 (4 Ω) 2 Ch: 290 W x 2 (4 Ω) Filters Bypass Hi-Pass Lo-Pass Band-Pass Yes A/B: 50 ÷ 3.2k Hz * 12 dB/Oct. A/B: 50 ÷ 3.2k Hz * 12 dB/Oct. - Distortion - THD (100Hz * 4Ω) 0.02% S/N Ratio (A weighted * 1V) 100 dB Damping factor (100Hz * 4Ω) 200

    2. RF Punch 600x4 (AB)-800+watts
    4-channel car amplifier
    75 watts RMS x 4 at 4 ohms (150 watts RMS x 4 at 2 ohms)
    300 watts RMS x 2 bridged at 4 ohms (4-ohm stable in bridged mode)

    3. Hertz HCP4-740watts
    Channel mode 4 - 3 - 2 Output Power (RMS) * 14.4 VDC 4 Ch: 65 W x 4 (4 Ω) 4 Ch: 95 W x 4 (2 Ω) 3 Ch: 65 W x 2 (4 Ω) + 190 W x 1 (4 Ω) 3 Ch: 95 W x 2 (2 Ω) + 190 W x 1 (4 Ω) 2 Ch: 190 W x 2 (4 Ω) Filters Bypass Hi-Pass Lo-Pass Band-Pass Yes A/B: 80 Hz * 12 dB/Oct. A/B: 50 ÷ 500 Hz * 12 dB/Oct. - Distortion - THD (100Hz * 4Ω) 0.01% S/N Ratio (A weighted * 1V) 103 dB Damping factor (100Hz * 4Ω) 120 Size W x D x H mm (in.) 315 x 190 x 50 (12.40 x 7.48 x 1.97)

    *3rd amp is cheaper by $100

    My next plan is to buy the stuff locally:
    1. Seps( morel tempo, hertz esk, or rainbow slc)
    2. DSP since i dont want to change current hu of 2017 civic
    3. 10-12inch sealed sub


    Will do the others pa isa isa(So wife wont be shocked)

    What amp would you suggest? I usually listen to alternative/progressive rock, electronic and jazz.

    Thanks
    Cls

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The first choice.

    Fortunately, Class D amplifiers has gone a long way na and they aren't really shunned by the general SQ public anymore. I love their efficiency.

  6. Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,527
    #2466
    Quote Originally Posted by donskie_0728 View Post
    Hi Sound guru's, I've been following this thread from quite sometime now and I have learned a lot for my sound set up.

    Hingi sana ako ng tulong nyo. I am currently using Focal 165FX on my mid, avh595BT HU, DLS P40amp and Kicker Comp R 12" (planning to replace soon) with 10" maybe JL or focal sub. I am leaning through SQ which I am now satisfied with these set up after learning on a hard way. Because I started my set up using LL 4ch and mono amp, pioneer seps and the Kicker sub. Which were all disposed and now changed to focal 165fx and DLS amp only, except for the kicker sub which I like to sell also soon.

    Now, my question is it is worth putting a PC 165F (coaxial) to the back seat (dont know what does it called) where the stocks speaker was installed. The stock speaker was still there but was not wired, meaning hindi siya pinagana ng installer ko. I just want to know kung mag improve pa and sound quality and listening pleasure especially to my passengers if I install a coaxial speaker in that location? or better stay on my current set up and spend my extra bucks in replacing my subs into a compatible SQ set up? BTW, my car is a vios sedan.

    Thanks in advance for those who will give advise and critics.
    You're still partway sa audio journey mo. Long way to go! But push lang!

    The best choice is to maximize your gear. If I were in your shoes, I would:
    1. Retain the Kicker Comp R subwoofer
    2. Invest in a 4-channel amplifier with DSP
    3. Bridge the Kicker on the P40 amp
    4. Have your front-stage on the new amplifier
    5. Tune it well

    Pointers:
    1. Subwoofers still sound great even without being hooked to a DSP. Just set the proper crossovers and play with the phase.
    2. Try to listen to a well-tuned SQ car. You'll be amazed how you won't ever need the rear speakers once you get the tuning stuff correctly.
    3. To answer your question, throwing coaxials at your back will 95% just reduce your sound quality as their sound waves clash with the frontstage.
    4. In fact, I have yet to hear a good SQ system locally with the rear speakers on. Done correctly, it'll enhance "ambience" but it's extremely hard to get it correctly.
    5. Before you think of throwing a "SQ" subwoofer in your car, do know that there's no such thing as "SQ" subwoofers; there's only good tuning.
    6. Given a certain sound level, your 12" Kicker is technically superior than those 10" Focal and JL subs that you want to replace it with. Bigger displacement means less Xmax which translates to less distortion.
    7. Don't give in to marketing

  7. Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    47
    #2467
    Quote Originally Posted by jhnkvn View Post
    The first choice.

    Fortunately, Class D amplifiers has gone a long way na and they aren't really shunned by the general SQ public anymore. I love their efficiency.
    Thanks jhnkvn. Im also thinking of an amp with dsp already like the Mosconi 130.4 dsp. Any exprerience with a amps with dsp?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    258
    #2468
    Thanks Sientobente, I am now starting to convince to take the coaxials out of the equation. Yes my headunit has time alignment features which was maximized by my installer. Since it already has the TA feature do you think I still need a dsp or it will be a very little improvement if I put one? Coz we all know that dsp's are not cheap...

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    258
    #2469
    Quote Originally Posted by jhnkvn View Post
    You're still partway sa audio journey mo. Long way to go! But push lang!

    The best choice is to maximize your gear. If I were in your shoes, I would:
    1. Retain the Kicker Comp R subwoofer
    2. Invest in a 4-channel amplifier with DSP
    3. Bridge the Kicker on the P40 amp
    4. Have your front-stage on the new amplifier
    5. Tune it well

    Pointers:
    1. Subwoofers still sound great even without being hooked to a DSP. Just set the proper crossovers and play with the phase.
    2. Try to listen to a well-tuned SQ car. You'll be amazed how you won't ever need the rear speakers once you get the tuning stuff correctly.
    3. To answer your question, throwing coaxials at your back will 95% just reduce your sound quality as their sound waves clash with the frontstage.
    4. In fact, I have yet to hear a good SQ system locally with the rear speakers on. Done correctly, it'll enhance "ambience" but it's extremely hard to get it correctly.
    5. Before you think of throwing a "SQ" subwoofer in your car, do know that there's no such thing as "SQ" subwoofers; there's only good tuning.
    6. Given a certain sound level, your 12" Kicker is technically superior than those 10" Focal and JL subs that you want to replace it with. Bigger displacement means less Xmax which translates to less distortion.
    7. Don't give in to marketing
    Thanks for the input jhnkvn...more queries below:
    1. Do you think retaining my kicker comp R will be better to give that chest bump but still soft for the SQ type of music?
    2. My current amp DLS P40 is a 4channel already where my front and sub was linked. Do you think I still need to add another 4ch with dsp or get a sole dsp only to linked with my P40 amp?
    3. Since my P40 is 4ch...it is where my kicker was bridged. Does getting a mono amp for the kicker will be a better choice so to let my front use the P40 solely?

    Which of the below set up would you go into?
    A. Pioneer 595BT - existing
    Focal PS165fx - existing
    A new 4ch ampli with dsp - to run the focal mid - NEW
    DLS P40 4ch amp for the kicker sub bridged with the new ampli with DSP. - existing

    B. Pioneer 595BT - existing
    Focal PS165fx - existing
    DSP - NEW - bridged with the DLS P40 amp running the focal mid and kicker sub.

    C. Pioneer 595BT - existing
    Focal PS165fx - existing
    DLS P40 4ch amp - existing to run the focal mid
    MONO amp for the kicker sub - NEW

    D. Pioneer 595BT - existing
    Focal PS165fx - existing
    DLS P40 4ch amp - to run the focal mid - existing
    DSP for the DLS 4ch amp - NEW
    MONO amp for the kicker sub - NEW

    Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,527
    #2470
    Quote Originally Posted by cls View Post
    Thanks jhnkvn. Im also thinking of an amp with dsp already like the Mosconi 130.4 dsp. Any exprerience with a amps with dsp?
    Manufacturers are slowly integrating DSPs into their amps. I find that it's a good decision naman but be wary as sometimes the added cost of the DSP (DSP amp vs normal amp) is higher than the cost of a dedicated DSP. While a dedicated DSP will also need wires (as you'll factor that in), I'm still biased on separating them if possible.

    Mosconi is a great brand and the DSP interface is pretty functional naman. I'd say go with it if the cost of it is better than buying a standalone DSP (there are ones for cheap locally like Firland Audio, Lightning Lab, etc.). As an idea, I'm not really fickle on expensive DSPs vs cheap ones so I'd prefer you go for cheap ones. The realm of professional/studio audio has seen the advent of cheap DSPs for years with no problem.

audio set-up for beginners [continued]