Results 391 to 400 of 828
-
June 17th, 2010 11:30 PM #391
It looks like in jpdm's eyes that being poor is a crime.
If you cant afford it, he would rather not have you exist.
That is what jpdm's world would be.
All "who can afford" can live there.
Everyone else ... well, he doesn't care what happens to you as long as you don't live in jpdm's world.
-
-
June 17th, 2010 11:54 PM #393
something to think about:
the new-car-lobby needs a new market
they are looking at the public transport sector
currently, the new-car-makers do not benefit from PUJs
PUJs use surplus parts
if PUJs are made illegal, a huge market opens up for them
they want the govt to use the LTO and the Clean Air Act to regulate PUJs out of existence
as PUJs are abolished, the govt invites investors to provide replacements for PUJs -- new mini buses produced by the new-car-makers
---
if abolishing PUJs isnt possible, they can use the Clean Air Act to regulate surplus engines out existence
PUJ operators will have to replace the surplus engines with new engines
guess where the new engines will come from -- the new-car-makers
-
June 17th, 2010 11:56 PM #394
-
June 18th, 2010 12:16 AM #395
one-tracked mind eh
basta todo support niya yung brand new sector
dati CKD lang support niya, ayaw niya sa new CBUs kasi wala daw jobs created pag CBU
later on (if you read his posts), pati new CBUs support na niya
basta brand new
ever since nalaman niya nasa Japan surplus sector ako, tumindi ang galit niya sa Japan surplus
Japan surplus = smuggled
haha
-
-
June 18th, 2010 12:58 AM #397
para walang away...kailagan natin ng brand new na mga kotse na kasing presyo ng surplus.
yung mga mayayaman na lang ang mag branded cars. yung mga OFW a katulad namin na mahihirap, motorsiklo, AUV o OTJ na lang. or chinese or indian ultra cheap cars. of course kailangan brand new.
-
June 18th, 2010 01:39 AM #398
-
June 18th, 2010 05:44 AM #399
+1 for your fertile imagination.
-1 obviously this came from your fantasy and delusion.
--That being poor is a crime when I denouncing smuggling?That the poor should not exist when Im denouncing the illegal act of smuggling?
Categorically, not about this.
You conclusion is very faulty.
Obviously either you are making a spin or just plain lying.
Its not a matter of being rich when Im denouncing smuggling?
What a conclusion.
It is a matter of being disconnected with reality and replacing it with your own brand of deluded fantasy.
By the way, who is disconnected from reality? And who replaced reality with his own brand of deluded fantasy?
I say you love to project. Obviously.Last edited by jpdm; June 18th, 2010 at 06:26 AM.
-
June 18th, 2010 06:00 AM #400
Walang sariling statement o baka naman nakikita mo lang statements ng dynamic duo na si ghosthunter at uls?
Who told you that Im rich and being poor is a crime for me?
You tell me. review my posts.
Im only denouncing an illegal activity called smuggling. Who made that conclusion that banning smuggling of goods is anti-poor and favors the rich?
Have I not made statements that minimizing smuggling will increase the revenues of the government?
Have you read all the articles I posted? Some of them are not just articles but formal research done by academics?Last edited by jpdm; June 18th, 2010 at 06:10 AM.
As expected, in response to Tesla’s entry into the Philippines market, Ford will be bringing in the...
Tesla Philippines