Results 11 to 20 of 828
-
-
January 6th, 2010 12:14 AM #12
i wasnt enlightened by that
it's vague
“We have long advocated that given the opportunity and the resources, the Filipino engineer can build a truly Pinoy vehicle.
we here in tsikot forums also keep saying that
what's new?
Villareal said the proposed PBV must be locally-designed, developed and assembled vehicle for the mass market, low priced, with high local value added labor and materials and compliant to standards.
sounds great
but it's just some guy talking about a dream project
"the proposed PBV must be so and so..."
it's so vague it's not even an actual plan
it's like the discussions here in tsikot
"the pinoy car will have so and so specs... it will also have so and so features... it will be this... it will be that..."
it's like a guy talking about what kind of car he's gonna build one day... when he gets the chance to build it... and when he has the money
According to the study Deloitte Economics (Australia), the Philippines could be the best bet as the second regional hub for the global auto players provided the right government incentives support and commitment of players to invest and expand operations to attain a global manufacturing scale of 500,000 units by 2020.
couldnt they have figured that out by themselves?
they just had to visit China, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and study the motor vehicle manufacturing operations in those countries... talk with the CEOs... talk with local government officials
now that the consulting firm has handed over its research to the association, are the association members gonna follow the recommendations?
as long as the recommendations are in line with the interests of the members
if there are recommendations that go against the interest of some of the members (i'm sure some members are pissed off), the association will fractureLast edited by uls; January 6th, 2010 at 12:55 AM.
-
January 6th, 2010 08:09 AM #13
Read it again. It was already spelled out.
what's new?
Its the 2010 MVDP. With new incentives to compete in an almost zero tariff regime. Plus the PBV plan. Unlike the old one. Read carefully the articles I have posted so that you can make some accurate conclusions.
sounds great
but it's just some guy talking about a dream project
"the proposed PBV must be so and so..."
The guy at least knows what he is talking about, being the president of MVPMAP, a major stakeholder of the auto industry and proponent of the new MVDP.
How about you? Are you a major stakeholder of the auto industry in this country? Fact is, he can speak with authority regarding this MVDP plan unlike you.
it's so vague it's not even an actual plan
it's like the discussions here in tsikot
"the pinoy car will have so and so specs... it will also have so and so features... it will be this... it will be that..."
it's like a guy talking about what kind of car he's gonna build one day... when he gets the chance to build it... and when he has the money
the association must have paid a lot of money for those words of wisdom
couldnt they have figured that out by themselves?
Unlike other people here in Tsikot, who thinks they know it all and keeps on putting down efforts and abilities of fellow tsikot members.
they just had to visit China, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and study the motor vehicle manufacturing operations in those countries... talk with the CEOs... talk with local government officials
now that the consulting firm has handed over its research to the association, are the association members gonna follow the recommendations?
as long as the recommendations are in line with the interests of the members
if there are recommendations that go against the interest of some of the members (i'm sure some members are pissed off), the association will fracture
And let the association become fractured. I rather see those pure CBU traders to just close shop because they are not doing anything really good for the local auto industry in so far as its development (investment, employment and local manufacturing) is concern.These CBU traders only makes the Philippines overly dependent on expensive imported auto parts.Making Pinoy consumers hostage to their parts and prices.
But the government's desire to maintain auto manufacturing or assembly operations here should prevail.Last edited by jpdm; January 6th, 2010 at 08:55 AM.
-
January 6th, 2010 01:33 PM #14
my post:
they just had to visit China, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and study the motor vehicle manufacturing operations in those countries... talk with the CEOs... talk with local government officials
Brilliant! How come these multinationals with operations in these countries you have mentioned failed to do this or think about this?
what was that?
what i meant was --- if the local motor vehicle companies wanted to find out why the local motor vehicle industry is so anemic and how to pump up the industry, instead of hiring a consulting firm to tell them what's wrong and what to do, they should have just gone on trips to Asian countries where the motor vehicle industries are on steroids (like China, Thailand)
that's what investors do
wanna learn about the best airport/airline security in the world, go to Israel
wanna learn how to produce massive quantities of ethanol, go to Brazil
wanna learn all about rice, go to IRRI
wanna know why foreign automakers prefer to manufacture in Thailand?
go look for answers in Thailand
go find out what incentives the Thai govt gave automakers that encouraged them to invest in Thailand and come back here and tell the our govt what the Thai govt did and HOPE our govt would do the same
decades ago, the Japanese went to the US to learn how to make TVs and stereos
---
Consulting...
you get paid a lot of money so you can tell people what their problems are and offer them solutions
but you don't give them all the solutions
that way when they fail to fix their problems, they'll keep coming back to you
great racket
if people only tried hard enough, they can find out what their problems are all by themselvesLast edited by uls; January 6th, 2010 at 01:48 PM.
-
January 7th, 2010 08:02 AM #15
Obviously, you didi not get it.
Again for you to understand.
The local companies the articles (or I'm mentioning) are talking about are local subsidiaries of Japanese and American auto companies that dominate the Asian auto market (except Korea and China) and of course Thailand and the rest of the Asean countries...
In the Philippines they dominate and control 90% of the market. So your brilliant idea is nothing more but elementary concept to them. They hired the consulting firm from Australia maybe because they what to scientifically prove something what they know via research. At the same time, it will confirm their assumptions and enriched their knowledge of the prevailing conditions in the Philippines.
As I say, they are smart enough to say they dont know everything or other factors that affect the auto industry in the PHILIPPINES and the probable solutions applicable to this country. You cant find all the solutions in other countries. You can only use them as reference. That's why the consulting firm came up with a model using prevailing Philippine situation vis-a-vis our foreign competitors.
I hope you will understand now.
---
Consulting...
you get paid a lot of money so you can tell people what their problems are and offer them solutions
but you don't give them all the solutions
that way when they fail to fix their problems, they'll keep coming back to you
great racket
if people only tried hard enough, they can find out what their problems are all by themselves
Spare me this speculative statements of yours.
And this issue is definitely irrelevant.
As an observant and reader, Im definitely inclined to believe the authors and proponents (namely the PACCI, MVPMAP and the government's BOI) of the MVDP and the PBV because aside from being the main stakeholders of the auto industry, the program is backed up by a commissioned study/research.
Obviously and very clearly, you are not an authority and not even credible enough to speak about the MVDP and the making statements dismissing the efforts made by the major auto industry players to develop the local auto industry through MVDP.
-
January 7th, 2010 10:45 AM #16In the Philippines they dominate and control 90% of the market. So your brilliant idea is nothing more but elementary concept to them. They hired the consulting firm from Australia maybe because they what to scientifically prove something what they know via research. At the same time, it will confirm their assumptions and enriched their knowledge of the prevailing conditions in the Philippines.
they hired the consulting firm so they'll have credible results to show the Phil. govt
our govt will not simply act on recommendations from the business group coz it comes across as too biased when recommendations come from the business group itself
the opinion of a third party like a foreign consulting firm will make the recommendations more credible and less biased
that's why the business group would pay a lot money just for a "study"
-
-
January 7th, 2010 12:59 PM #18
haha
like you said
you are just an "observant" and "reader"
and you're exactly right
all you do is observe the local auto industry and read news articles
and that makes you what?
an expert on the local auto industry?
someone with "authority" and "credibility"?
haha
wannabe
-
January 7th, 2010 01:06 PM #19
Cool it boys...
jpdm and uls, both of you are in the same boat.
Neither of you are experts.
No amount of "observation" & "reading" will make you one.
------------------------
*jpdm - no number of cut & paste articles you post in tsikot.com forum will make you an expert in any field.
------------------------
enough said.
-